The ‘Silent Killer’ of SaaS Growth: Reducing Time-to-Value (TTV)

The New Unit of SaaS Economics: Why Speed Wins in 2026

The era of "shelfware" is dead. The tolerance for complex, multi-month implementation cycles has evaporated, replaced by a market that demands instant utility. In 2026, the primary currency of the SaaS economy is not just Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR), but the velocity at which that revenue is validated by the customer. If you are() or seeing high sign-up volumes with abysmal activation rates in your SaaS, the root cause is almost invariably a Time-to-Value (TTV) problem.

For the past decade, the SaaS industry obsessed over the top of the funnel. We optimized Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), refined ad spend, and built aggressive outbound sales engines. But as we settle into the mid-2020s, the data reveals a harsh truth: acquiring a customer is financially irrelevant if they do not activate. The "silent killer" of growth isn't a lack of leads; it is the friction between the promise of your marketing and the proof of your product.

In 2026, TTV is the defining metric of operational efficiency. It serves as a proxy for product-market fit, user experience (UX) quality, and future retention. When TTV drags, churn spikes. When TTV is compressed, Net Revenue Retention (NRR) expands. This report is a forensic analysis of why SaaS companies bleed revenue in the first 90 days and provides a definitive operational blueprint to stop it.

The Macro Environment: Saturation and AI

The market conditions of 2026 have intensified the need for speed. Two primary forces are at play:

1. Market Saturation: For every vertical, there are dozens of competitors. Switching costs have plummeted. If your onboarding is difficult, the user can switch to a competitor in tabs, not months.

2. The AI Expectation: The proliferation of AI-native tools has retrained user brains. Users now expect software to do the work for them, instantly. An AI tool that generates a marketing plan in 10 seconds sets the bar for your project management tool that requires 10 hours of configuration.

This reality requires a shift in mindset from "training users" to "delivering outcomes."

Defining Time-to-Value in the Age of AI

Historically, TTV was a fuzzy metric, often conflated with "Time to Live" (implementation completion) or "Time to Launch." In the modern context, we must be precise.

Time-to-Value (TTV) is the elapsed duration from the moment a user signs up (or signs a contract) to the moment they experience their first meaningful "Aha! Moment"—the specific action that confirms the product can solve their core problem.

The Spectrum of Value

Value is not monolithic. It occurs in stages, and optimizing TTV requires accelerating the first stage while paving the way for the others.

In 2026, the benchmarks for TTV have tightened significantly. According to aggregated product data, the average TTV across B2B SaaS is approximately 1.5 days (specifically 1 day, 12 hours, and 23 minutes). However, this average disguises the extreme variance between successful companies and the "living dead."

Benchmarks by Segment

Understanding where your product sits relative to your specific cohort is essential for accurate diagnosis. A TTV of 7 days might be world-class for an ERP system but a death sentence for a productivity app.

1. SMB & PLG (Product-Led Growth)

• Benchmark: < 24 Hours (Ideal: < 15 Minutes).

• Context: Users in this segment expect "consumer-grade" speed. Friction here is fatal. If the "Aha! Moment" requires human intervention or lengthy configuration, users will bounce.

• Data Insight: Top-quartile PLG companies achieve activation rates of over 40% by delivering value in the first session.

2. Mid-Market

• Benchmark: 7–14 Days.

• Context: This often involves mild configuration, team invites, or data imports. The user is willing to invest some time but expects steady progress markers.

• Data Insight: The median TTV for companies with $10M–$50M ARR is roughly 2 days, suggesting that even as complexity grows, the best companies automate the initial setup.

3. Enterprise

• Benchmark: 30–90 Days.

• Context: High-touch implementation, security reviews, and integrations. However, the perception of value must be established earlier, often through "Proof of Concept" (POC) phases or interactive demos before full deployment.

• Data Insight: Enterprise SaaS TTV averages closer to 1 day, 16 hours for the software access, but full value realization takes longer due to organizational inertia.

4. AI/ML Tools

• Benchmark: < 1 Hour.

• Context: The expectation for generative AI is immediate output. If an AI writing tool takes 3 days to "learn your voice," it will likely be abandoned for one that works instantly with a zero-shot model.

• Data Insight: AI & ML tools show the highest activation rates (54.8%) because the value delivery (the output) is often instantaneous upon prompt entry.

  
  

The Silent Killer: How TTV Correlates with Churn and NRR

Why do we call TTV the "Silent Killer"? Because its effects are often delayed in reporting but immediate in reality. A customer who churns in Month 6 likely "checked out" mentally on Day 2 when they couldn't figure out how to import their data. They became a "zombie account"—billable but disengaged—until the renewal notification gave them the prompt to cancel.

The Mechanics of Churn

Data from 2025 indicates that 75% of churn risk is influenced by the onboarding experience. If a user feels successful in their first session, their likelihood of 90-day retention jumps significantly. Conversely, poor onboarding is the primary driver of voluntary churn, which accounts for approximately 70-80% of all SaaS churn.

• Voluntary Churn: The customer actively cancels because the product failed to deliver value (high TTV).

• Involuntary Churn: Payment failures or technical issues. While annoying, this is operational. Voluntary churn is existential.

The NRR Multiplier

Net Revenue Retention (NRR) is the holy grail of SaaS valuation. It measures how much your revenue grows from the existing customer base through expansion and upsells, net of churn.

• Correlation: Companies with top-quartile activation rates (where TTV is minimized) see NRR significantly higher than the median of 106%.

• Causation: Faster value realization leads to faster expansion. A customer who sees value in Day 1 is ready for an upsell in Day 30. A customer still struggling to configure the tool in Day 30 is a churn risk, not an upsell candidate.

  
  

CAC Payback and Efficiency

The median CAC payback period worsened to nearly 20 months in 2024 reports due to rising ad costs and market saturation. This places immense pressure on retention. If you spend $5,000 to acquire a customer, and they churn in month 3 due to slow TTV, you have destroyed capital. Reducing TTV accelerates the journey to Lifetime Value (LTV), allowing you to recoup acquisition costs faster by moving customers to higher tiers earlier.

The 90-Day Activation Window: The Golden Quarter

The first 90 days of a customer's lifecycle are predictive of their entire lifetime value. This "Golden Window" is where habits are formed—or abandoned.

The "Use It or Lose It" Dynamic

Behavioral data suggests a distinct lifecycle of engagement that is determined in the first quarter:

1. Month 1 (Activation): This is the domain of TTV. The goal is to get the user to core utility. High drop-off here indicates a failure of onboarding or a disconnect between marketing promises and product reality.

2. Month 2 (Adoption): The user begins to incorporate the tool into their weekly workflow. They move from "trying" to "using."

3. Month 3 (Habituation): The tool becomes indispensable. It is now part of the "tech stack."

If a user has not reached "Habituation" by Day 90, the probability of them churning within the first year is over 70%. Cohorts that achieve key value milestones within the first 30 days ("Fast Adopters") exhibit up to 4x higher LTV compared to slow adopters.

The Valley of Death

The "Valley of Death" for SaaS retention is that dangerous period after the dopamine hit of the purchase wears off but before the habit is firmly established. Reducing TTV shifts the customer out of this valley quickly. If you leave them there, enthusiasm wanes, and buyer's remorse sets in.

Strategic Implication: Your Customer Success (CS) and Product teams must be maniacally focused on the first quarter. Post-sales support shouldn't be generic "checking in"; it should be driving specific value milestones. If a customer hasn't achieved X result by Day 30, they should be flagged as "At Risk," even if they are paying their bills on time.

The Psychology of Onboarding: Why Users Quit

To reduce TTV, we must understand the human mind. Users are cognitively lazy. They arrive at your product with a limited reserve of "motivation fuel." Every form field, every confusing button, and every loading screen burns that fuel. When the tank hits zero, they leave.

We can leverage three key psychological principles to keep the tank full and drive completion.

1. The Endowed Progress Effect

People are more motivated to complete a task if they feel they have already made progress toward it. They want to finish what they started.

• The Mechanism: A famous study on car wash loyalty cards showed that people given a card with 10 slots and 2 pre-stamped slots were nearly twice as likely to complete the card as those given a blank 8-slot card, even though the effort required (8 washes) was identical.

• SaaS Application: Never start your onboarding checklist at 0%. When a user lands in your dashboard, show them a progress bar that is already 20% full.

• Step 1: Create Account (Checked)

• Step 2: Verify Email (Checked)

• Step 3: Connect Data Source (Unchecked)

• Why it works: It reframes the onboarding from "a mountain to climb" to "a task nearly finished." It exploits our desire for completion and momentum.

  
  

2. The Zeigarnik Effect

Humans have an innate desire to close open loops. We remember uncompleted tasks better than completed ones, and uncompleted tasks create a mild cognitive tension—a "mental itch"—that we want to scratch.

• The Mechanism: Bluma Zeigarnik, a Soviet psychologist, observed that waiters could remember complex orders only until they were served. Once completed, the memory vanished. The tension of the "incomplete" task kept the memory active.

• SaaS Application: Use persistent, unobtrusive checklists (like a sidebar widget) that show "3 of 5 Setup Tasks Complete."

• Tactical Nuance: Do not hide the checklist once the user clicks away. Keep it visible. The visual reminder of the incomplete state drives the user to perform the final actions (e.g., "Invite a Teammate") just to close the loop and resolve the cognitive tension.

  
  

3. Cognitive Load and "The 5-Second Test"

Your user should know exactly what to do within 5 seconds of the dashboard loading. If they have to think, you are losing them.

• The Mistake: "Empty States." A dashboard with zero data that says "Welcome! To get started, navigate to settings..." is a high-cognitive-load environment. The user has to read, interpret, decide, and navigate.

• The Fix: "Templated States" or "Demo Data." Pre-fill the dashboard with sample projects, dummy metrics, or a template. Show them what "good" looks like immediately. This reduces the cognitive load of visualization.

• For more on how visual clutter destroys conversion, see our guide on().

  
  

PLG vs. SLG vs. Hybrid: Nuance in Onboarding Models

The dichotomy between Product-Led Growth (PLG) and Sales-Led Growth (SLG) is fading. In 2026, the dominant model is Hybrid. However, the onboarding tactics for the user vs. the buyer remain distinct, and misapplying them is a recipe for high TTV.

PLG Onboarding (The User-Centric Model)

• Goal: Rapid Activation and Virality.

• Method: Self-serve, interactive walkthroughs, "sandboxes."

• TTV Target: Minutes/Hours.

• Key Dynamic: The product is the onboarding. You remove all barriers. Humans are removed from the loop. Support is asynchronous or AI-driven.

• Best For: Simple, intuitive products with broad appeal (e.g., Calendly, Slack, Notion) where the end-user is the buyer or the champion.

  
  

SLG Onboarding (The Buyer-Centric Model)

• Goal: Strategic Alignment, Security, and Compliance.

• Method: White-glove setup, dedicated CSMs, training webinars.

• TTV Target: Days/Weeks.

• Key Dynamic: Humans guide the process. The complexity of the solution (e.g., Salesforce, Workday) necessitates configuration that a user cannot intuit alone.

• Best For: Complex, high-ticket enterprise software where the "setup" involves organizational change management, not just software configuration.

  
  

The Hybrid Reality

Successful 2026 companies use PLG to capture the bottom of the market (SMBs) and to "land" inside Enterprises via individual employees. They then layer on SLG (Sales) to "expand" those accounts by selling security, governance, and advanced features to the C-suite.

The Onboarding Conflict:

A common mistake in Hybrid models is subjecting the PLG user to SLG friction (e.g., "Request a Demo" to try the tool) or leaving the Enterprise user in a PLG void (no guidance on complex setup).

• Solution: Segment users immediately.

• User: "I am exploring for myself." -> Route to PLG flow (Interactive Tour).

• User: "I am evaluating for my company." -> Route to Hybrid flow (Concierge onboarding offer).

  
  

The Great Debate: Gated vs. Ungated Friction

One of the most contentious aspects of TTV reduction is the "Credit Card Wall." Should you require payment information for a free trial?

The Data: Opt-In vs. Opt-Out

Data aggregated from 2024-2025 benchmarks paints a clear picture of the trade-offs.

The Verdict for 2026

For most SaaS companies, Opt-In (No Credit Card) is the superior strategy for reducing TTV and maximizing long-term growth.

• Why: The math favors volume. Even with a lower conversion rate, the sheer increase in signups (3.4x higher) typically results in a higher total number of paying customers.

• The TTV Angle: Asking for a credit card creates a "Psychological Payment Wall" before value is proven. It forces the user to make a buying decision before they have experienced the Aha! Moment. This reverses the logic of TTV. You want them to experience value first, then pay.

• Exception: If your product has high variable costs per user (e.g., expensive AI compute or human services), a credit card wall is a necessary filter to prevent abuse and bankruptcy.

The "Reverse Trial" Tactic

A powerful hybrid approach is the "Reverse Trial."

1. User signs up (No Card).

2. User is placed on the Premium/Enterprise tier for 14 days.

3. User experiences maximum value.

4. At day 14, if they don't buy, they are downgraded to a Free tier (loss aversion) rather than locked out.This ensures TTV is maximized without the friction of a paywall, while leveraging the psychological pain of losing features to drive conversion.

   
   

Common Onboarding Bottlenecks and How to Fix Them

We have audited hundreds of flows. These are the specific friction points that consistently kill TTV and how to surgically remove them.

1. The "Empty State" Problem

The Issue: A user signs up for a project management tool, and the dashboard is a blank white screen waiting for them to "Create Project." This is terrifying for a new user. They don't know the terminology, the layout, or the potential.

The Fix: Never show a blank screen. Use Demo Data or Templates.

• Action: Pre-populate the dashboard with a sample project ("Website Launch") that has tasks, comments, and deadlines. Let the user delete it later. This allows them to see the value (the organized project) immediately without doing the work (creating tasks).

• 
  

2. The Verification Wall

The Issue: Forcing email verification before letting the user see the app. This is a massive momentum killer. The user has to leave your tab, open email, find the code, and come back. Many never return.

The Fix: Soft Verification.

• Action: Let them into the app immediately after the password set. Let them build, click, and play. Only require email verification when they try to perform a high-risk action like "Save," "Share," or "Export." Hook them first; verify them second.

  
  

3. Feature Bloat (The "Kitchen Sink" Tour)

The Issue: An 18-step product tour that greys out the screen and explains every button on the interface. Users hate this. They instinctively click "Skip" or "Next, Next, Next" without reading.

The Fix: Contextual Nudges.

• Action: Kill the linear tour. Use tooltips that trigger only when the user navigates to that section or when it is the logical next step in their workflow. If they are in the "Reports" tab, show them how to run a report. Do not show them how to run a report while they are in the "Settings" tab.

  
  

4. The "Data Silo" Setup

The Issue: The product requires data (contacts, code, files) to function, but the import process is manual and error-prone.

The Fix: One-Click Integrations.

• Action: Instead of asking users to "Upload CSV," give them a button to "Sync with Google Sheets" or "Connect Salesforce."

• AI Agent: Use an AI agent to parse messy data. "Upload any file, and our AI will format it."

  
  

The TTV Reduction Framework: A Diagnostic System

To systematically reduce TTV, you need a rigorous audit process. Use this 4-step framework to diagnose your own product.

Phase 1: Identify the "Aha! Moment"

You cannot reduce time to value if you don't know what "value" is.

• Action: Analyze your retention data. What action do retained users take that churned users do not?

• Slack: Sending 2,000 messages.

• Dropbox: Putting one file in a folder.

• Twitter: Following 30 users.

• Metric: Look for the "tipping point" where retention probability spikes. This is your activation event.

• 
  

Phase 2: Map the "Value Path"

List every single click, form field, email, and wait time between "Signup" and the "Aha! Moment."

• Action: Create a physical flowchart or use a tool like Miro.

• Audit: Count the steps. If it takes 25 clicks to get to value, your goal is to cut it to 10.

  
  

Phase 3: Friction Removal (The Machete Phase)

Ruthlessly cut steps that do not directly contribute to the Aha! Moment.

• Do we really need their phone number now? No. Cut it.

• Do they need to upload a profile picture? No. Cut it.

• Do they need to confirm their email now? No. Move it to later.

  
  

Phase 4: Velocity Injection (The Turbo Phase)

Add elements that speed up the process.

• Checklists: "3 steps to launch."

• Templates: "Start with this pre-made workflow."

• AI Assistants: "Let AI build your profile."

• 
  

What Most SaaS Teams Get Wrong

1. Confusing "Setup" with "Value"

Teams often celebrate when a user completes the setup wizard. This is a vanity metric. The user does not care about the wizard. The user cares about the result of the wizard. If the setup doesn't immediately yield a result (e.g., a dashboard, a report, a saved dollar), you haven't delivered value; you've just assigned homework.

2. Over-relying on Email Drip Campaigns

You cannot email your way out of a bad product experience. If your onboarding strategy relies on a "Day 3" email to explain how to use the software, you have already lost. The guidance must be in-app, contextual, and immediate. Email should be for re-engagement (bringing them back), not for primary instruction.

3. Ignoring the "Check-Out" Flow

In 2026, offboarding is part of the lifecycle. If a user cancels, TTV logic still applies—how fast can you get them to stay? Frictionless cancellation builds trust, but a strategic "pause" option or a downgrade to a free tier can retain the user relationship for future reactivation.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

• The "Welcome" Modal that Blocks the UI: Don't cover the entire screen with a generic "Hello" message that forces a click. Let users see the product they just signed up for.

• The Unskippable Video: Never force a user to watch a video. They will tab away and never come back. Video should be an option for learning, not a gate.

• Asking for "Company Size" Too Early: Unless this data changes the product experience immediately (e.g., by customizing the template), do not ask for it in the signup flow. Enrich the data later using tools like Clearbit or Apollo.

• Assuming Mobile Doesn't Matter for B2B: In 2026, even B2B buyers check the status of their signup on their phone during a commute. If your onboarding is broken on mobile, you break the chain of value.

• 
  

The Toolkit: Technology for Value Acceleration

You do not need to build your onboarding infrastructure from scratch. In 2026, the tech stack for onboarding is mature and specialized. Choosing the right tool depends on your growth model.

1. Userpilot (Product Adoption & PLG)

• Best For: Product Managers in SaaS/PLG.

• Key Differentiator: Best-in-class balance of features and price. Unlike competitors that focus purely on "tours," Userpilot emphasizes growth experiments. It offers deep analytics on user paths, A/B testing for flows, and "resource centers" (in-app help widgets).

• Use Case: Building contextual tooltips, checklists, and conducting NPS surveys without engineering support.

  
  

2. Vitally (Customer Success & SLG/Hybrid)

• Best For: CS Teams in B2B/Enterprise/Hybrid.

• Key Differentiator: It is a Customer Success Platform (CSP), not just a UI overlay. Vitally combines onboarding project management with customer health scores. It features "Hubs"—shared workspaces where your CS team and the client can collaborate on the onboarding checklist, document signing, and integration setup.

• Use Case: Managing high-touch implementations where "onboarding" involves human tasks, meetings, and shared documents, not just clicking buttons.

  
  

3. Appcues (The Veteran)

• Best For: Mobile App Support and Non-Technical Teams.

• Key Differentiator: Strong mobile app support (React Native, etc.) which many competitors lack. It has a very mature "flow builder."

• Use Case: Simple, effective walkthroughs for mobile-first SaaS products.

  
  

4. Pendo (Enterprise Analytics)

• Best For: Large Enterprises needing deep data.

• Key Differentiator: Pendo puts analytics first. It is a "system of record" for product usage. It is more expensive and complex but offers unparalleled insight into user behavior across massive user bases.

• Use Case: If you need to know exactly which feature usage correlates with retention across 1 million users.

  
  

5. FullStory / UXCam (Behavioral Observation)

• Best For: UX Researchers and Founders.

• Key Differentiator: Session replay.

• Use Case: You cannot fix what you cannot see. Watch a user rage-click on a broken "Next" button, and you will understand why your TTV is high.

  
  

The 2026 SaaS Onboarding Playbook

This is your execution strategy for the next 18 months.

1. The "AI Concierge" Model

In 2026, static wizards are obsolete. Replace them with AI agents.

• Instead of: "Select your industry from this dropdown. Upload your logo. Pick your brand colors."

• Do this: "Paste your website URL." -> AI crawls the site, detects the industry, brand colors, and logo, and auto-configures the dashboard.This reduces TTV from minutes to seconds. It creates a "magic moment" immediately.

  
  

2. Behavioral Personalization

One size fits none.

• Action: Ask one question at signup: "What are you here to do?" (e.g., "Manage a Project" vs. "Track Time").

• Result: The entire interface changes based on that answer. The "Project" user sees a Kanban board. The "Time" user sees a clock.

• Insight: See() for examples of how tailoring the view increases conversion.

  
  

3. "Value First, Account Second"

Allow users to use the tool on the homepage before they even create an account.

• Example: A logo maker lets you design the logo first. You only sign up to download it.

• Application: Let users run a report, generate a query, or build a form on your landing page. The "Signup" becomes a "Save Work" button.

  
  

The Step-By-Step Checklist

Use this to audit your current flow.

Pre-Signup:

• [ ] Is the value proposition clear on the landing page?

• [ ] Can users try the product (interactive demo) without signing up?

Signup Flow:

• [ ] Is the number of form fields < 3? (Email, Password, or SSO).

• [ ] Is SSO (Google/Microsoft) available?

• [ ] Is credit card requirement removed (for low-cost Tiers)?

• [ ] Is email verification delayed until necessary?

First Run Experience (FRE):

• [ ] Does the dashboard load in < 2 seconds?

• [ ] Is the "Empty State" replaced with "Demo Data" or "Templates"?

• [ ] Is there a progress bar (Endowed Progress) visible?

• [ ] Is there a clear, single CTA for the next step?

• [ ] Is the "Aha! Moment" achievable in < 5 minutes?

Post-Activation:

• [ ] Are emails triggered by behavior (e.g., "You didn't finish setup"), not just time?

• [ ] Is there a way to invite a colleague easily?

• [ ] Is the "Upgrade" path visible but not intrusive?

  
  

How to Measure and Report TTV

Founders must look at the dashboard weekly. If you don't measure it, you can't reduce it.

The Metrics that Matter:

1. Time to First Value (TTFV): Median time (hours/days) from Signup to [Aha! Event].

2. Goal: Decrease MOM (Month-Over-Month).

3. Activation Rate: % of signups who reach [Aha! Event] within a specific window (e.g., 7 days).

4. Benchmark: 25-30% is good for B2B; >50% is excellent.

5. Onboarding Completion Rate: % of users who complete the setup checklist.

6. Day 1 Retention: % of users who return 24 hours after signup.

7. Insight: Low Day 1 retention usually means the TTV was too long or the promise was false.

Reporting Cadence:

• Weekly: Product Team reviews Activation Rate.

• Monthly: Leadership reviews TTV and its impact on CAC Payback.

• Quarterly: Review definition of "Aha! Moment" (as the product evolves, the value definition might change).

  
  

Conclusion

The market in 2026 is unforgiving. Customers are drowning in software options. They do not have the time or the inclination to figure out your complex UI.

Reducing Time-to-Value is not a UX project; it is a revenue operation. It is the silent killer of growth because it happens in the dark, before the invoice is sent, and before the churn exit interview.

By compressing the distance between signup and value, you do more than just improve a metric. You earn the customer's trust. You prove that you respect their time. And in the subscription economy, trust is the currency that buys retention.

Fix your TTV, and you fix your growth.

Sources

1. What is Time-to-Value & How to Improve It + Benchmark Report 2024 - Userpilot, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://userpilot.com/blog/time-to-value-benchmark-report-2024/

2. User Activation Rate Benchmarks 2025 - Agile Growth Labs, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.agilegrowthlabs.com/blog/user-activation-rate-benchmarks-2025/

3. SaaS Statistics 2025: 93+ Stats & Insights [Expert Analysis] - Marketing LTB, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://marketingltb.com/blog/statistics/saas-statistics/

4. Voluntary Churn Benchmarks and Tactical Advice - Churnkey, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://churnkey.co/blog/voluntary-churn-benchmarks/

5. Retention Benchmarks for B2B SaaS in 2025 - Userlens, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.wudpecker.io/blog/retention-benchmarks-for-b2b-saas-in-2025

6. Net Revenue Retention: Why It's Crucial for SaaS Growth in 2025 | High Alpha, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.highalpha.com/blog/net-revenue-retention-2025-why-its-crucial-for-saas-growth

7. The Complete SaaS Metrics Benchmark Report 2025 - RockingWeb, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.rockingweb.com.au/saas-metrics-benchmark-report-2025/

8. SaaS Churn Rate Benchmarks 2025 - Agile Growth Labs, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.agilegrowthlabs.com/blog/saas-churn-rate-benchmarks-2025/

9. Cohort Analysis for SaaS Marketing: Beyond Basic Retention Metrics, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://winsomemarketing.com/saas-marketing/cohort-analysis-for-saas-marketing-beyond-basic-retention-metrics

10. "Endowed Progress" Effect — The Secret To On-boarding More Users - Interactive Digital, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://interactivedigital.ltd/blog/endowed-progress-effect/

11. Zeigarnik Effect UX | Tips and Examples - Page Flows, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://pageflows.com/resources/zeigarnik-effect-ux/

12. Increase your SaaS MRR with the Psychology of User Onboarding - Blog Usetiful, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://blog.usetiful.com/2025/08/increase-saas-mrr-user-onboarding-psychology.html

13. Product-Led Growth vs Sales-Led Growth: A Complete Guide in 2025 - Jimo, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://jimo.ai/blog/product-led-growth-vs-sales-led-growth-a-complete-guide-in-2025

14. How to Combine Product Led Growth Vs Sales Led Growth For Success in 2025 - Userflow, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.userflow.com/blog/understanding-product-led-growth-vs-sales-led-growth-in-2024

15. Why SaaS Companies Are Ditching Credit Cards for Free Trials - LeadSync, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://leadsync.me/blog/ditching-credit-card-requirements-for-free-trials/

16. BEST FREE TRIAL CONVERSION STATISTICS 2025 - Amra & Elma, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.amraandelma.com/free-trial-conversion-statistics/

17. What Is an Aha Moment in SaaS? Metrics and How to Measure - Statsig, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.statsig.com/perspectives/aha-moment-saas-metrics

18. 8 Aha Moment Examples for SaaS Companies (+ How to Find One) - Userpilot, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://userpilot.com/blog/aha-moment-examples/

19. Appcues vs Pendo, Reimagined for Growth-Minded Teams - Userpilot, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://userpilot.com/compare/appcues-vs-pendo/

20. Tried and Tested Onboarding Platforms for 2025 - Userpilot, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://userpilot.com/blog/onboarding-platforms/

21. The 20 Best Tools Every CSM Needs to Use - Vitally, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.vitally.io/post/tools-every-csm-needs-to-use

22. Best Gainsight Competitor Solutions for Streamlined Customer Success - Userpilot, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://userpilot.com/blog/gainsight-competitor/

23. Appcues vs. Userpilot 2025 Comparison - A better alternative - UserGuiding, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://userguiding.com/blog/appcues-vs-userpilot

24. The top 8 in-app guidance tools in 2025 - Pendo, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://www.pendo.io/pendo-blog/the-top-8-in-app-guidance-tools-in-2025/

25. SaaS Product Analytics: A Comprehensive Guide - UXCam, consulté le décembre 10, 2025, https://uxcam.com/blog/saas-product-analytics/